Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /nfs/c01/h07/mnt/33811/domains/promoneytalk.com/html/wp-includes/cache.php on line 36

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /nfs/c01/h07/mnt/33811/domains/promoneytalk.com/html/wp-includes/query.php on line 21

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /nfs/c01/h07/mnt/33811/domains/promoneytalk.com/html/wp-includes/theme.php on line 540

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /nfs/c01/h07/mnt/33811/domains/promoneytalk.com/html/wp-includes/cache.php:36) in /nfs/c01/h07/mnt/33811/domains/promoneytalk.com/html/wp-includes/feed-rss2.php on line 2
Pro Money Talk http://www.promoneytalk.com The most popular podcast on money related topics. Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:34:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 en ©www.promoneytalk.com http://www.promoneytalk.com/feed paulpuri@gmail.com (www.promoneytalk.com) paulpuri@gmail.com(www.promoneytalk.com) Business & Money 1440 The most popular podcast on money related topics. www.promoneytalk.com www.promoneytalk.com paulpuri@gmail.com No clean http://www.promoneytalk.com/images/itunes/pmt_feed_logo.jpg Pro Money Talk http://www.promoneytalk.com 144 144 Charles de Lardemelle - Former Fund Manager at First Eagle http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/10 http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/10#comments Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:27:25 +0000 dsnow http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/10 In this episode of Pro Money Talk Jason interviews Charles de Lardemelle, former fund manager at First Eagle. Charles and First Eagle are famous for their global value investing approach and in this interview Charles talks about value investing, his approach for valuating companies, why most investors do not practice value investing, and the risk and return profile of this type of investing. This is one of the most enlightening shows we have ever produced for those interested in investing topics. A must listen!

Given the opportunities that present themselves in volatile markets, this interview is particularly timely. Additionally, First Eagle Global, a fund Peter and Jason have used for a long time, has re-opened to new investors and may be of interest to some listeners. While value investing is nothing new, from Graham to Buffett those who do it well have been very successful. Charles is one who does it well and he shares his insights with our listeners.

We hope you enjoy this show, and here’s to your success!!!

Jason and Peter

 

]]>
http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/10/feed 56:38 In this episode of Pro Money Talk Jason interviews Charles de Lardemelle, former fund manager at First Eagle. Charles and First Eagle are famous ... In this episode of Pro Money Talk Jason interviews Charles de Lardemelle, former fund manager at First Eagle. Charles and First Eagle are famous for their global value investing approach and in this interview Charles talks about value investing, his approach for valuating companies, why most investors do not practice value investing, and the risk and return profile of this type of investing. This is one of the most enlightening shows we have ever produced for those interested in investing topics. A must listen! Given the opportunities that present themselves in volatile markets, this interview is particularly timely. Additionally, First Eagle Global, a fund Peter and Jason have used for a long time, has re-opened to new investors and may be of interest to some listeners. While value investing is nothing new, from Graham to Buffett those who do it well have been very successful. Charles is one who does it well and he shares his insights with our listeners. We hope you enjoy this show, and here's to your success!!! Jason and Peter #160; Latest,Show www.promoneytalk.com no No
Dr. Cochran: A Mental Health Moment http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/6 http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/6#comments Thu, 07 Feb 2008 04:32:01 +0000 dsnow http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/6 On this episode of Pro Money Talk, Jason interviews Dr. Margaret Cochran, a psychotherapist and host of “A Mental Health Moment”.

They discuss the reasons many of us don’t fully address our financial planning needs and how we can overcome these problems. Dr. Cochran talks about handling our fears, procrastination, and the mindset that make some successful and others not.

This last topic, what Dr. Cochran refers to as “plenty vs. paucity”, is a powerful theory and she has made it her mission to educate the public on this topic. Dr. Cochran believes that each of us forms our basic understanding of the world and the opportunities it provides us in childhood and that from there on we are separated into two camps, those who view opportunities as endless and those who view them as finite. By recognizing which fundamental belief system we hold, and the repercussions of those beliefs, we can re frame our entire view of the world and benefit from the change. Although we only touch on this topic, it is something you will undoubtedly hear more about in the future.

The behaviors that Dr. Cochran and Jason discuss that prevent people from establishing a concrete financial plan are issues that each of us deal with to some extent. Every listener will identify with some part of this conversation and recognize these behaviors in friends and loved ones. The good news is that once identified, the reasons for inaction are overcome and each of us can move closer to our goals of maximizing our financial lives.

Dr. Cochran has a site which also contains her own podcast. You can reach it here.

]]>
http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/6/feed 42:31 On this episode of Pro Money Talk, Jason interviews Dr. Margaret Cochran, a psychotherapist and host of ldquo;A Mental Health Momentrdquo;. They discuss the reasons many ... On this episode of Pro Money Talk, Jason interviews Dr. Margaret Cochran, a psychotherapist and host of ldquo;A Mental Health Momentrdquo;. They discuss the reasons many of us donrsquo;t fully address our financial planning needs and how we can overcome these problems. Dr. Cochran talks about handling our fears, procrastination, and the mindset that make some successful and others not. This last topic, what Dr. Cochran refers to as ldquo;plenty vs. paucityrdquo;, is a powerful theory and she has made it her mission to educate the public on this topic. Dr. Cochran believes that each of us forms our basic understanding of the world and the opportunities it provides us in childhood and that from there on we are separated into two camps, those who view opportunities as endless and those who view them as finite. By recognizing which fundamental belief system we hold, and the repercussions of those beliefs, we can re frame our entire view of the world and benefit from the change. Although we only touch on this topic, it is something you will undoubtedly hear more about in the future. The behaviors that Dr. Cochran and Jason discuss that prevent people from establishing a concrete financial plan are issues that each of us deal with to some extent. Every listener will identify with some part of this conversation and recognize these behaviors in friends and loved ones. The good news is that once identified, the reasons for inaction are overcome and each of us can move closer to our goals of maximizing our financial lives. Dr. Cochran has a site which also contains her own podcast. You can reach it here. Past,Shows www.promoneytalk.com no No
Interview with Rob Arnott - Chairman and Founder of Research Affiliates http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/35 http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/35#comments Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:36:21 +0000 dsnow http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/35 In this episode we interview Rob Arnott chairman and founder of Research Affiliates, about his pioneering innovation called “fundamental indexing”. This is one of those evolutionary shifts in thinking that is generating great debate in the advisor community and could radically change the way individuals invest.

In short, Arnott identified a major problem with typical index investing and found a potential solution. The problem is that indexes are “cap weighted” so that companies that are overpriced make up more of the typical index than companies that are underpriced. Obviously since prices tend to revert towards their mean, or true value, this cap weighting hurts overall performance.

The problems with cap weighting were illustrated in 2000-2002. In 2000 the average stock was up, as it was in 2001 and 2002. But in 2000 and 2001 the indexes took a big hit. The reason for this was because technology stocks had become seriously overvalued, the prices were way too high. This overvaluation meant that their cap weight was very high, giving them a disproportionate weight in the index. Therefore when those stocks crashed, and because they had become such a large piece of the indexes, they brought the entire indexes down.

Had the indexes not been cap weighted, but weighted on traditional methods of determining size, the indexes would not have crashed. Arnott went beyond that to look back over 45 years to determine the difference in returns between a fundamental index and cap weighted index. He found that over that period of time, the fundamental index outperformed a cap weighted index by 2.2% per year, compounded. He also found that traditional risk measurements showed a fundamental index to be slightly less risky than the cap weighted index

Why do we cap weight stocks?
1. The markets are cap weighted, therefore cap weighted indexes represent the performance of the markets as a whole
2. It’s been done this way for a long time
3. It does better than the average actively managed fund

However, that does not mean it’s the most efficient way of weighting stocks. Arnott argues that sales, revenues, earnings, cash flow, assets, book value, dividends, number of employees, and other traditional methods of determining size of companies is more efficient. So fundamental indexing gives bigger weights to bigger companies, irrespective of stock value.

In short, a fundamental index weighs the company, not the stock price. It erases the problem of over weighting overvalued stocks and under weighting undervalued stocks.

When applied worldwide, it was found that fundamental indexing could improve international investing by 3%. Not only do stocks have bubbles but countries have bubbles too, therefore fundamental indexing works well not just on US stocks, but on a worldwide basis as well.

Find out more about Rob and Research Affiliates here Research Affiliates®

Articles on fundamental investing:

A better way to index? - October 30, 2006
Fundamental index funds merit a look - InvestmentNews
Index Wars (PowerShares FTSE RAFI U.S. 1000 Portfolio, SPDR Trust) | SmartMoney.com
PIMCO Bonds - Arnott Fundamental Indexing Interview

Wikipedia definition of fundamental indexing:

Fundamentally based indexes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

]]>
http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/35/feed 69:02 In this episode we interview Rob Arnott chairman and founder of Research Affiliates, about his pioneering innovation called "fundamental indexing". This is one of ... In this episode we interview Rob Arnott chairman and founder of Research Affiliates, about his pioneering innovation called "fundamental indexing". This is one of those evolutionary shifts in thinking that is generating great debate in the advisor community and could radically change the way individuals invest. In short, Arnott identified a major problem with typical index investing and found a potential solution. The problem is that indexes are "cap weighted" so that companies that are overpriced make up more of the typical index than companies that are underpriced. Obviously since prices tend to revert towards their mean, or true value, this cap weighting hurts overall performance. The problems with cap weighting were illustrated in 2000-2002. In 2000 the average stock was up, as it was in 2001 and 2002. But in 2000 and 2001 the indexes took a big hit. The reason for this was because technology stocks had become seriously overvalued, the prices were way too high. This overvaluation meant that their cap weight was very high, giving them a disproportionate weight in the index. Therefore when those stocks crashed, and because they had become such a large piece of the indexes, they brought the entire indexes down. Had the indexes not been cap weighted, but weighted on traditional methods of determining size, the indexes would not have crashed. Arnott went beyond that to look back over 45 years to determine the difference in returns between a fundamental index and cap weighted index. He found that over that period of time, the fundamental index outperformed a cap weighted index by 2.2% per year, compounded. He also found that traditional risk measurements showed a fundamental index to be slightly less risky than the cap weighted index Why do we cap weight stocks? 1. The markets are cap weighted, therefore cap weighted indexes represent the performance of the markets as a whole 2. It's been done this way for a long time 3. It does better than the average actively managed fund However, that does not mean it's the most efficient way of weighting stocks. Arnott argues that sales, revenues, earnings, cash flow, assets, book value, dividends, number of employees, and other traditional methods of determining size of companies is more efficient. So fundamental indexing gives bigger weights to bigger companies, irrespective of stock value. In short, a fundamental index weighs the company, not the stock price. It erases the problem of over weighting overvalued stocks and under weighting undervalued stocks. When applied worldwide, it was found that fundamental indexing could improve international investing by 3%. Not only do stocks have bubbles but countries have bubbles too, therefore fundamental indexing works well not just on US stocks, but on a worldwide basis as well. Find out more about Rob and Research Affiliates here Research Affiliatesreg; Articles on fundamental investing: A better way to index? - October 30, 2006 Fundamental index funds merit a look - InvestmentNews Index Wars (PowerShares FTSE RAFI U.S. 1000 Portfolio, SPDR Trust) #124; SmartMoney.com PIMCO Bonds - Arnott Fundamental Indexing Interview Wikipedia definition of fundamental indexing: Fundamentally based indexes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Past,Shows www.promoneytalk.com clean No
Interview - Sam Harding - Retirement Plans - Success Story 2 - Mike H. http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/9 http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/9#comments Sun, 08 Apr 2007 00:41:46 +0000 dsnow http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/9

  • What would you be willing to do if you knew that you could save hundreds of thousands of dollars in income taxes while building a secure retirement? Would you be willing to invest a little time learning about the options available to you?In this episode of Pro Money Talk, we discuss retirement plans; how they work, the various types available, basic considerations in choosing a plan for a business, and some of the recent changes that have been enacted. Our guest is Sam Harding, a local Bay Area Pension Administrator with over 25 years’ experience in helping companies set up and administer retirement plans for their owners and employees.Our interview and discussion applies only to U.S. tax laws and provisions. The good news is that we’ve seen substantial improvements to the benefits available to participants in retirement plans, as the Government moves to provide more options and alternatives to supplement traditional sources of retirement income such as Social Security and company pension plans.
  • Show recorded in March of 2006; short follow-up interview recorded in January, 2007 to update for Pension Protection Act, passed in mid-2006, so the interview is a combination of two parts. The second part was recorded outdoors at a hotel where we were attending a professional meeting that Sam was a speaker at, so you’ll notice an obvious change in sound quality, but it still sounds clear.
  • The discussion does get technical; you’ll want to stop and replay certain segments to get a better understanding, but it’s well worth it.

Success Segment

This episode of Pro Money Talk provides a high-level introduction to the valuable tax-advantaged savings plans available to business owners in the U.S. Our expert guest is Sam Harding, an Accredited Pension Administrator (APA) with more than 25 years of experience in retirement plan consulting and administration for small to mid-sized businesses. If you’re in business (even if you’re the sole employee of your company), or if you’re thinking of starting a business, you need to know about these potent savings tools.

Our discussion provides a roadmap, including definitions, of various retirement plans with a focus on so-called “qualified plans” that offer the biggest benefits for business owners and employees.

Revised plan contribution limits. Automatic enrollment (companies can choose to opt employees in to 401k plans).

A handy pdf document comparing various types of retirement plans as well as their advantages and disadvantages may be found here.

Sam Harding is the founder and President of Retirement Administration, Inc., based in Los Altos, California. Sam is an Accredited Pension Administrator (APA). He has served a three-year term on the Board of Directors of the National Institute of Pension Administrators (NIPA), and is the past president of the Northern California NIPA Chapter. Sam brings more than twenty-five years of experience in meeting the retirement planning needs of small to mid-sized companies. More information about Retirement Administration, Inc., may be found here.

]]>
http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/9/feed 84:07 What would you be willing to do if you knew that you could save hundreds of thousands of dollars in income taxes while building a ... What would you be willing to do if you knew that you could save hundreds of thousands of dollars in income taxes while building a secure retirement? Would you be willing to invest a little time learning about the options available to you?In this episode of Pro Money Talk, we discuss retirement plans; how they work, the various types available, basic considerations in choosing a plan for a business, and some of the recent changes that have been enacted. Our guest is Sam Harding, a local Bay Area Pension Administrator with over 25 yearsrsquo; experience in helping companies set up and administer retirement plans for their owners and employees.Our interview and discussion applies only to U.S. tax laws and provisions. The good news is that wersquo;ve seen substantial improvements to the benefits available to participants in retirement plans, as the Government moves to provide more options and alternatives to supplement traditional sources of retirement income such as Social Security and company pension plans. Show recorded in March of 2006; short follow-up interview recorded in January, 2007 to update for Pension Protection Act, passed in mid-2006, so the interview is a combination of two parts. The second part was recorded outdoors at a hotel where we were attending a professional meeting that Sam was a speaker at, so yoursquo;ll notice an obvious change in sound quality, but it still sounds clear. The discussion does get technical; yoursquo;ll want to stop and replay certain segments to get a better understanding, but itrsquo;s well worth it. Success Segment Mike H, a young saver with insights beyond his years. More information at Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retirement_plan This episode of Pro Money Talk provides a high-level introduction to the valuable tax-advantaged savings plans available to business owners in the U.S. Our expert guest is Sam Harding, an Accredited Pension Administrator (APA) with more than 25 years of experience in retirement plan consulting and administration for small to mid-sized businesses. If yoursquo;re in business (even if yoursquo;re the sole employee of your company), or if yoursquo;re thinking of starting a business, you need to know about these potent savings tools. Our discussion provides a roadmap, including definitions, of various retirement plans with a focus on so-called ldquo;qualified plansrdquo; that offer the biggest benefits for business owners and employees. Revised plan contribution limits. Automatic enrollment (companies can choose to opt employees in to 401k plans). A handy pdf document comparing various types of retirement plans as well as their advantages and disadvantages may be found here. Sam Harding is the founder and President of Retirement Administration, Inc., based in Los Altos, California. Sam is an Accredited Pension Administrator (APA). He has served a three-year term on the Board of Directors of the National Institute of Pension Administrators (NIPA), and is the past president of the Northern California NIPA Chapter. Sam brings more than twenty-five years of experience in meeting the retirement planning needs of small to mid-sized companies. More information about Retirement Administration, Inc., may be found here. Past,Shows www.promoneytalk.com no No
The Flat Tax - Interview with Steve Forbes http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/11 http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/11#comments Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:57:59 +0000 dsnow http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/11 At Pro Money Talk we always try to bring you the most influential and knowledgeable guests on each topic. In some cases those guests are not only famous in their industry, but in some cases they are known more widely. The topic we chose for this show was the flat tax, and we are very happy to announce that our interviewee for the show is Steve Forbes.

Steve is the editor-in-chief of Forbes magazine and CEO of Forbes Inc. You may remember that he ran in the presidential primaries in 1996 and 2000 on a platform that included the introduction of a flat rate income tax.

In addition to the flat tax, Steve is a strong supporter of free market thinking and restrained government spending. In this interview we talked to Steve about:

· His 17% flat income tax proposal.

· How low income Americans would pay no income tax.

· Avoiding estate, capital gains, and AMT taxes.

· Competing for jobs and industry in a global economy.

· The paradox of how a flat tax can lower individual income tax but raise tax revenues.

· Giving taxpayers a choice between tax systems to avoid fear of loss.

We wrap up the discussion with a quick take on the recently deceased Nobel laureate Milton Friedman.

For more information on Steve Forbes, the flat tax, and Steve’s book, Flat Tax Revolution, please see the links below.

Steve Forbes - Wikipedia

Flat Tax - Wikipedia

Forbes Inc.

Flat Tax Revolution on Amazon

]]>
http://www.promoneytalk.com/archives/11/feed 39:15 At Pro Money Talk we always try to bring you the most influential and knowledgeable guests on each topic. In some cases those guests are ... At Pro Money Talk we always try to bring you the most influential and knowledgeable guests on each topic. In some cases those guests are not only famous in their industry, but in some cases they are known more widely. The topic we chose for this show was the flat tax, and we are very happy to announce that our interviewee for the show is Steve Forbes. Steve is the editor-in-chief of Forbes magazine and CEO of Forbes Inc. You may remember that he ran in the presidential primaries in 1996 and 2000 on a platform that included the introduction of a flat rate income tax. In addition to the flat tax, Steve is a strong supporter of free market thinking and restrained government spending. In this interview we talked to Steve about: middot; His 17% flat income tax proposal. middot; How low income Americans would pay no income tax. middot; Avoiding estate, capital gains, and AMT taxes. middot; Competing for jobs and industry in a global economy. middot; The paradox of how a flat tax can lower individual income tax but raise tax revenues. middot; Giving taxpayers a choice between tax systems to avoid fear of loss. We wrap up the discussion with a quick take on the recently deceased Nobel laureate Milton Friedman. For more information on Steve Forbes, the flat tax, and Steversquo;s book, Flat Tax Revolution, please see the links below. Steve Forbes - Wikipedia Flat Tax - Wikipedia Forbes Inc. Flat Tax Revolution on Amazon Past,Shows www.promoneytalk.com clean No